Tom Hanks plays FedEx employee Chuck Noland, who becomes stranded on an island after his plane crashes. When you watch a Tom Hanks film, you know that no matter what, you will always end up rooting for his character. However, Man of Steel’s endlessly violent ending does not serve the character or the franchise. Man of Steel is an origin film, and so had the potential to set the tone for both the character Superman, and the DC Extended Universe. Superman as a rule, does not kill and showing him doing so, especially in such a violent way, is awkward to watch. This is so far from Superman’s character that it feels painful to watch. This then culminates in Superman killing General Zod, by snapping his neck in front of frightened onlookers. The climactic battle between Superman and General Zod, in which Metropolis is all but destroyed, is unnecessary and feels like destruction for destruction’s sake. This is mostly due to the controversy surrounding the ending scenes. Although a box office success, the film is the subject of some divisive opinions. Pictures’ DC Extended Universe, Man of Steel needed to make an impact. Jack, who lived for every moment and had an adventurous spirit, would have made a lot more effort to survive.Īs the first instalment in Warner Bros. But what can be agreed on, is that Jack’s death is a divisive ending. Whereas other people have theories on why there was not enough room, citing everything from the buoyancy of the door to the exact temperature of the water. This has driven audiences wild for years, with so many people feeling that there was plenty of space for Jack on the door as well. Jack helps Rose on to some floating debris, a large wooden door, but fails to climb on board himself. Regardless of this, the ending of the Titanic remains a hotly debated subject, and the same question keeps coming up – was there enough room for Jack on that door?Īfter the Titanic has gone down, our two romantic leads are stranded in the freezing ocean waters. Of course, being based on a true-life event, the audience always knew what the ultimate ending was going to be – the Titanic would sink. The 1997 film is epic on so many counts – the running time, the budget, the box office records it smashed, and not to mention its fourteen Academy Award nominations of which it won eleven. When even the cast are not sure what is going on, then perhaps the ending should have been rethought. But even he admits that the majority of audiences did not understand the ending, and that the actors themselves were unsure of what the ending meant. This has been dismissed by Grease co-creator Jim Jacobs. One fan theory that has gained momentum, is that Sandy was dead the entire time and at the end of the film, she ascends to heaven. A film that was all about the everyday lives of high school students, suddenly takes a supernatural turn. And then there is the car flying off into the sky. Firstly, there is the niggling feeling of identity politics – why did they both have to change who they were to get the other’s attention? Sandy has to dress up, and Danny has to dress down. The ending has always felt slightly unsatisfactory, on a few counts. Literally in this case, as the car ascends into the sky. ![]() The last scene shows Sandy and Danny reuniting, after a dramatic makeover, and then they drive off together into the sunset. This fun filled musical from 1978, about a group of high school students in the 50’s, is one of the highest grossing live action musicals of all time, and has frequently made it into the Best Musical lists. As you can expect, there will be spoilers. ![]() The following films all have endings which feel insufficient for the audience, and do not give the feeling of a satisfactory conclusion. Sometimes that conclusion is ambiguous or sad, sometimes it is happy or funny, but it should invoke the feeling that the ending fits the film. But it does need to feel like the correct conclusion to the story. ![]() The ending of a film does not always need to be happy or tie up all the loose ends. You have invested time, money and emotions into the film, you have rooted for the characters, you have hated the villain, and you want something to show for it. The thing about a film ending, is that it is the ultimate payoff for an audience. And on the flip side, a bad film can be looked upon more favourably if the ending is good. No matter the length, genre or budget, a great film can become a mediocre film if the ending is weak. Films can be made or broken on their endings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |